<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back in the Saddle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.b-masters.com/2008/06/03/back-in-the-saddle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.b-masters.com/2008/06/03/back-in-the-saddle/</link>
	<description>Meh.  I&#039;ve seen worse.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyzard</title>
		<link>http://www.b-masters.com/2008/06/03/back-in-the-saddle/comment-page-1/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>lyzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b-masters.com/?p=316#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that Winters is some sort of decorator. Films of the fifties and sixties are full of overtly gay male interior decorators; I&#039;m wondering if by 1957, &quot;decorator&quot; had become movie shorthand for &quot;gay&quot;? And of course there&#039;s the usual sex dichotomy in this: male = Odious Comic Relief, female = Corpse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that Winters is some sort of decorator. Films of the fifties and sixties are full of overtly gay male interior decorators; I&#8217;m wondering if by 1957, &#8220;decorator&#8221; had become movie shorthand for &#8220;gay&#8221;? And of course there&#8217;s the usual sex dichotomy in this: male = Odious Comic Relief, female = Corpse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

